{rfName}
Va

License and use

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Redondo, JiAuthor
Share
Publications
>
Article

Validation of the Spanish version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale to assess postoperative pain in cats [Validez y confiabilidad de la versión en Español de la escala multidimensional de la UNESP-Botucatu para evaluar el dolor postoperatorio en gatos]

Publicated to:Archivos De Medicina Veterinaria. 46 (3): 477-486 - 2014-01-01 46(3), DOI: 10.4067/S0301-732X2014000300020

Authors: Brondani, J T; Luna, S P L; Crosignani, N; Redondo, J I; Granados, M M; Bustamante, H; Otero, P

Affiliations

Univ Austral Chile, Fac Ciencias Vet, Valdivia, Chile - Author
Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Ciencias Vet, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina - Author
Univ CEU Cardenal Herrera, Fac Vet, Valencia, Spain - Author
Univ Cordoba, Fac Vet, Cordoba, Spain - Author
Univ Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Vet & Zootecn, Botucatu, SP, Brazil - Author
Univ Republica, Fac Vet, Montevideo, Uruguay - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords
CatsPainScaleValidation

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Archivos De Medicina Veterinaria, and although the journal is classified in the quartile Q4 (Agencia WoS (JCR)), its regional focus and specialization in Veterinary Sciences, give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.42, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions May 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-05-07, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 9
  • Scopus: 11
  • Google Scholar: 27
  • OpenCitations: 7
Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-05-07:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 87 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Argentina; Brazil; Chile; Uruguay.